I spent eight years in the United States Air Force. I’ve seen action during the Gulf War, and I left the military with 11 ribbons. A federal appeals court has thrown out one man’s conviction for wearing military medals he did not earn. As a matter of fact, here are my ribbons:
I earned each one with my service so excuse me if I say I am pissed at the latest ruling by the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. They ruled that wearing unearned military medals constitutes a protected form of free speech.
The court ruled that wearing unearned military medals constitutes a protected form of free speech.
The case revolves around a Elven Swisher, who lied about secret missions to Korea and classified wars to receive $2,366 a month in benefits from the Veterans Administration. Among his fraudulent claims, Swisher claims he also received a Silver Star, a Bronze Star with “V” device, and a Purple Heart.
Men who steal this recognition are nothing more than thieves. This is not being done as freedom os speech; it’s being done to benefit from different things afforded to military veterans.
According to Stars and Stripes, Swisher:
…served in the Marine Corps from 1954 to 1957, the Chronicle reported. In 2001, he applied for disability benefits, claiming he had been wounded in a secret mission to North Korea in 1955, after the Korean War ended. The Department of Veterans Affairs granted the request in 2004 after Swisher submitted what appeared to be a military document saying he had been awarded a Silver Star and other medals for his actions.
But the VA learned in 2006 that the document was forged and ordered Swisher to repay the benefits, the paper noted. He was later convicted and sentenced to a year in prison on charges that included stealing government funds and
wearing unauthorized medals at a veterans’ event.
The appeals court upheld Swisher’s conviction in 2009, but he filed a new appeal after the court, in a 2010 case, struck down a federal law that made it a crime to lie about earning military decorations. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, agreed with the Ninth Circuit in June 2012 that the law violated freedom of speech. But three months later, in another case, a different Ninth Circuit panel upheld the ban on wearing unearned military medals.
Investigators looked into Swisher’s military claims after he testified to the awards during a 2005 trial of a man charged with soliciting the murder of a federal judge.
You can read the full decision here (PDF link).
What do you think of this ruling? Share your comments below