What happens when you try and try to create false narratives against your primary target, and it doesn’t work? You go after your target’s loved ones to get a rise out of your main goal.
The liberal media’s primary target is President Donald Trump. He had a great weekend in Saudi Arabia during his first overseas visit. The country welcomed him with open arms, and Arab News loved Melania Trump. While the parents were virtually untouchable from major lies and scandals, the media set their sights on daughter Ivanka.
I have been on record that there’s a strong possibility that Ivanka and husband Jared Kushner should not be in the White House because I think they are liabilities. But creating lies about them to draw a rise out of Daddy Trump is not the way to go.
Most fraud Leftist propaganda outlets have carefully worded their ‘articles’ to make it sound like Ivanka in in charge of, or running, the fund. That’s completely FALSE. She recommended and supports and through negotiation helped the Saudis attention to the subject to contribute. Otherwise, she has NO ties, NO money, and NO administrative stake in the fund.
Source: The Daily Caller
Journalists and pundits alike spread fake news on Twitter Sunday that Ivanka Trump was engaged in pay-to-play with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
The false story started with a Wall Street Journal reporter Rebecca Ballhaus misrepresenting an article from her outlet. The story, “Saudi Arabia, U.A.E. Pledge $100 Million To Word Bank’s Women Entrepreneurs Fund,” says that the president’s daughter proposed the creation of the fund, but “Ms.Trump doesn’t control it or raise money for it.”
Ballhaus, however, said in a tweet that it was “Ivanka’s Women Entrepreneurs Fund.” Reporters ended up picking up on the tweet, and CNN’s Jim Sciutto wrote, “This is virtually identical to what Trump and others in GOP criticized Clinton Foundation for.” His tweet received nearly 10,000 retweets.
One MSNBC analyst, Malcolm Nance, went as far as to say, “Good lord. Trumps do Literal Pay-to-Play. This is grounds for immediate dismissal [from] government.”
Here are liberals losing their minds:
When Hillary Clinton accepted monies from Saudi Arabia, her hypocrisy was strong front and center. Clinton’s relationship with Saudi Arabia was for personal gain, and everyone knew that. It was a pay to play to build up a war chest to have influence over weaker politicians and remind them who was in charge with broad connections. That is not Ivanka Trump.
Do you think these media names went too far to compare Ivanka with Hillary? Share your opinions below in the comment section and let me know what you think.
Help support conservative news and views by sharing this post on Facebook and Twitter. Want more of my views? Don’t forget to follow the Wayne Dupree Show social media accounts on Facebook, Spreaker, iHeartRadio, Google Plus & Twitter.
Are you sick of seeing ads? Well then it's time to get rid of them! WayneDupree.com is proud to offer a PREMIUM VIP MEMBERSHIP that eliminates ads and gives you the BEST browsing experience.
Follow Wayne on Rumble!