Kamala Cannot Break a Tied Vote for “SCOTUS Nominee” According to Top Biden Legal Ally

Kamala Cannot Break a Tied Vote for “SCOTUS Nominee” According to Top Biden Legal Ally

There’s a lot of back and forth going on with this SCOTUS nominee.


TIME Magazine put out a piece claiming the GOP could sink Biden’s nominee, and in less than 24-hours they had to retract it, claiming they were wrong.

So, when I saw this latest piece, I was hesitant, but it’s a staunch Biden ally and a Harvard Law professor making the claim, so I’ll report on it and see what happens.

If you’re familiar with Laurence Tribe, you know he’s a hardcore Biden/Harris ally and as I mentioned above, he’s also a Harvard Law Professor.

And he’s saying that Kamala Harris can not be the “tie-breaker” in a SCOTUS vote.

It’s not just him saying it, he says it’s the Constitution saying it.

MORE NEWS: Americans Demand Transcript of Biden’s “Zelensky Call” After Disturbing CNN Report is Wiped Off The Internet 

Will you vote for Trump in 2024?(Required)
This poll gives you access to Wayne Dupree's newsletter! Unsubscribe any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Daily Caller reported that Laurence Tribe, a Harvard Law professor and legal ally of President Joe Biden’s administration, has stated that vice presidents do not have the authority to make a tie-breaking vote for a Supreme Court nominee’s approval in the Senate.

News of Justice Stephen Breyer’s intent to retire broke Wednesday, though the 87-year-old has not formally announced the move. The news puts Biden in the position of having to pass a nominee through a 50-50 Senate, raising the question of whether Harris can cast a tie-breaking vote.


Tribe has previously advised the administration on at least one questionable legal move: the extension of a federal eviction moratorium in August.

Tribe previously weighed in on the issue in September of 2020, when he argued “the vice president doesn’t have the power to break a tie” on an appointment. Tribe made the statement as Republicans were gearing up to approve former President Donald Trump’s final SCOTUS nominee, then-judge Amy Coney Barrett.

“While the vice president has the power to cast a tiebreaking vote to pass a bill, the Constitution does not give him [or her] the power to break ties when it comes to the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” role in approving presidential appointments to the Supreme Court,” he wrote.


Well, that means we need to get Manchin or Sinema on our side, and we cannot let Collins, Murkowski, or Romney (or any other RINO) flip to their side, which could happen so easily.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WayneDupree.com

I'm glad you're here, WayneDupree.com comments! Please maintain polite and on-topic conversations. You could see comments from our Community Managers, who will be identified by a "WD Staff" or "Staff" label, in order to promote fruitful and civil discussions. We stop accepting comments on articles three days after they are posted in order to provide the optimal user experience. The conversations forums on WayneDupree.com welcome comments for an unlimited period of time. For further information, please refer to our community policies.

SIGN UP HERE and join us!
Follow Wayne on Rumble!
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x