Dems Seethe After SCOTUS Sides With Republicans On Major Voting Map Issue

Dems Seethe After SCOTUS Sides With Republicans On Major Voting Map Issue

Score another big “election win” for the good guys.

***FOLLOW US ON RUMBLE***

And trust me, the Dems are seething over this latest victory — and it comes directly from the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Dems thought they could pull some sneaky stuff in Wisconsin with their “re-districting maps,” which is just another form of cheating.

But Republicans took them to court and won.

Daily Wire reported that the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with Wisconsin Republicans challenging “redistricting” efforts from Democrats in the state, throwing out legislative maps drawn by Democratic Governor Tony Evers and adopted by its highest court, The Washington Post reported.

MORE NEWS: Well-Respected Pollster Thinks He Knows Why Troops Looked So “Perplexed” in That “Biden Pizza” Photo

The Supreme Court granted a Republican request to block new maps that “increased the number of state Assembly districts with a majority of Black voters from six to seven,” Reuters reported. “The court sent that case back to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and ordered it to adopt new maps laying out the various districts.”

Is the Mar-A-Lago raid an unjust witch hunt?(Required)
This poll gives you access to Wayne Dupree's newsletter! Unsubscribe any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court “committed legal error in its application of decisions of this Court regarding the relationship between the constitutional guarantee of equal protection and the VRA (Voting Right Act),” the opinion said, adding that the state court “believed that it had to conclude only that the VRA might support race-based districting — not that the statute required it. … Our precedent instructs otherwise.”
“The question that our VRA precedents ask and the court failed to answer is whether a race-neutral alternative that did not add a seventh majority-black district would deny black voters equal political opportunity,” the majority wrote.

***FOLLOW US ON CLOUDHUB***

The Wisconsin court “is free to take additional evidence if it prefers to reconsider the Governor’s maps rather than choose from among the other submissions. Any new analysis, however, must comply with our equal protection jurisprudence,” it added.

Vox reported that the high court used a process known as “summary reversal” to toss the maps, “meaning that the Court tossed out the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision completely without receiving full briefing or hearing oral arguments.”

****FOLLOW US ON TELEGRAM***

Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented from the majority.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WayneDupree.com

One of the most dependable websites for original reporting, investigative reporting, and breaking news in the conservative media is now WayneDupree.com. It is the only group combating communist bias in the media and entertainment, and it is its hard news division.

Because the success of our objective is so important to the economy and because leftist media's COVID falsehoods probably cost lives, we need your help. Donate to WayneDupree.com today so that we can keep covering stories that the leftist media won't touch. Your decision to donate $5 per month, $50 per year, or $100 per year will enable us to continue the difficult work of making sure a free and fair media survives in our nation.
[The WDStaff]

SIGN UP HERE and join us!
Follow Wayne on Rumble!