There’s a very good reason the American public no longer respects or trusts the FBI, and this story I am about to share with you is one of those reasons. First off, if you’ve been paying attention, you know that the left is using the term “disinformation” to control the flow of information. And when the Hunter Biden laptop story came out, instantly, the left called it “Russian disinformation” and dismissed it. We all know that was not true, and the laptop was 100 percent valid. And, the FBI knew that all along, after all, they had Hunter’s laptop in their possession. What Rudy had was a copy of the hard drive.
The FBI had the real deal. They knew the copy Rudy has was real.
And now, thanks to an interview between Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, and Joe Rogan, we know that same FBI who had possession of Hunter’s laptop asked Facebook “generally restrict” election interference for 7 days. First off, is that their job now? To decide what’s real information and what’s not? And what was the exact wording used and the process that was followed? And also, if that is their job, why did they ask Facebook to censor anything? After all, nobody knew better than the FBI that Hunter’s laptop was 100 percent real since they had the original in their possession.
Here’s what Mark said: “BREAKING: Mark Zuckerberg tells Joe Rogan that Facebook algorithmically censored the Hunter Biden laptop story for 7 days based on a general request from the FBI to restrict election misinformation.”
You want to talk about “bigger than Watergate…” This takes the cake.
You can watch the video below:
BREAKING: Mark Zuckerberg tells Joe Rogan that Facebook algorithmically censored the Hunter Biden laptop story for 7 days based on a general request from the FBI to restrict election misinformation. pic.twitter.com/llTA7IqGa1
— Minds💡 (@minds) August 25, 2022
This is stunning information.
Here’s what people online are saying:
“More FBI Election Interference”
“Dan Crenshaw told us all we should support the FBI a couple of days ago LOL”
“This should be a big story. It won’t be.”
“Is Zuckerberg covering his ass right now?”
“So not only did FBI brass say not to investigate this (according to the whistleblower) — for fear of influencing the elections — but they also pressured a private company to restrict the story’s dissemination?”
“Seriously? So the FBl told the media what it should and should not publish? Add this to the ever-growing list of reasons this organization needs to be reconsidered.”
“Like we were saying: DEFUND THE FBI”
“FBI knew the laptop was legit.”
“Government organization meddling in a “private” company is now not a private company and is now an arm of the state. Just look at twitter and google and Facebook as the government. And not independent.”
“In another time, we would have called that ‘election interference’”
“FB is basically working with the FBI to censor speech.”
Not sure why Mark said this. Many are now wondering if he “flipped sides.”
But one thing we do know is that we need more answers. Congress must investigate this further.
I'm glad you're here, WayneDupree.com comments! Please maintain polite and on-topic conversations. You could see comments from our Community Managers, who will be identified by a "WD Staff" or "Staff" label, in order to promote fruitful and civil discussions. We stop accepting comments on articles three days after they are posted in order to provide the optimal user experience. The conversations forums on WayneDupree.com welcome comments for an unlimited period of time. For further information, please refer to our community policies.
SIGN UP HERE and join us!
Follow Wayne on Rumble!