There are still so many questions surrounding the Pelosi attack. Much of the information we’ve heard from the media has been retracted, and now they’re claiming it’s “false.” This is making it much harder for an already “suspicious” public, to trust the media. Here’s the latest info that’s being shared about Pelosi’s attack. This comes from the LA Times and was reported by Zero Hedge:
As rumors abound across social media, new details have emerged in the hammer assault on Paul Pelosi, husband of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi — including the eyebrow-raising news that Pelosi referred to his assailant as a “friend” when calling police.
Here’s an updated account as it’s been reported by the Los Angeles Times and various other media outlets citing police sources — along with some perspective on popular speculation about the incident.
After reportedly breaking through a rear door in the very early hours of Friday morning, DePape entered the house and at some point confronted Pelosi.
Pelosi excused himself from DePape by saying he needed to use the bathroom. There, he made a surreptitious 911 call on his cellphone, close to 2:30 am. Politico cites sources who say the phone had been charging there.
When directing the police response, the San Francisco Police dispatcher relayed what Pelosi said, referring to him as “RP,” which is police jargon for “reporting party”:
“RP stated that there’s a male in the home and that he’s going to wait for his wife. RP stated that he doesn’t know who the male is, but he advised that his name is David and that he is a friend. RP sounded somewhat confused.”
In a police response that’s far from typical in America’s cities today, cops arrived at the Pelosi house in just about 2 minutes. They knocked, and someone opened the door, though it’s not clear who.
The police observed the two men, each with one hand on a single hammer, and ordered both of them to drop it. DePape immediately pulled it from Pelosi and started hitting him with it. The cops tackled DePape and took him into custody.
There’s something of an inconsistency in the LA Times characterization of Pelosi’s 911 call. The Times article, citing police sources, first reports that Pelosi “tricked” DePape and made a surreptitious phone call, but later, the same article says “officials believe Pelosi was intentionally giving coded information because the intruder knew Pelosi was on the phone.”
Perhaps the call started surreptitiously and but then DePape overheard him, or Pelosi was at least wary of it. With that in mind, it’s conceivable Pelosi wasn’t being sincere in calling DePape a “friend,” but rather was trying to soothe the reportedly nutty DePape, who’s been described as a “psychotic, homeless addict estranged from his nudist lover and their children” — and who “talks to angels.”
If Pelosi was being overheard or fearful of it, that may also explain why the dispatcher described Pelosi as sounding “somewhat confused.” At Friday’s press conference, San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott said dispatcher Heather Grimes had to read between the lines of Pelosi’s call for help:
“She had to interpret what she was being told. And based on her experience and intuition, she basically figured out that there was something more to this incident than what she was being told. Her actions, in my opinion, resulted in both a higher-priority dispatch and a faster police response.”
Famously, DePape is said to have yelled “Where is Nancy? Where is Nancy?” It’s not exactly clear when.
Pelosi underwent surgery to “repair a skull fracture, and serious injuries to his right arm and hands,” according to a statement from Nancy Pelosi’s office.
All across social media, one can find assertions that DePape was in his underwear when police arrived, with others saying both he and Pelosi were in their underwear.
Citing “sources,” San Francisco Fox affiliate KTVU on Friday reported that DePape was in his underwear. However, KTVU has retracted that claim and posted a correction at the bottom of the article: “An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him.”
It’s not like we’re getting “new” info, it’s like they’re just rearranging the info we’ve already been told, and made no sense. They’re trying to make sense of things now, at least that’s how it feels to me.
So, while this story still feels so bizarre, Fox News Host Jesse Watters is calling for a reexamination of that Paul Pelosi’s drunk driving incident, where mystery still abounds.
“Paul Pelosi’s DUI must be re-examined. The off duty local sheriff was first on the scene claiming he randomly drove by but left because it wasn’t his jurisdiction. He admits there was a witness but the DA won’t let him say if the witness was Paul’s passenger. The witness fled.”
You can watch the video below:
Paul Pelosi’s DUI must be re-examined. The off duty local sheriff was first on the scene claiming he randomly drove by but left because it wasn’t his jurisdiction. He admits there was a witness but the DA won’t let him say if the witness was Paul’s passenger. The witness fled. pic.twitter.com/wWfmxFOFP0
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) October 30, 2022
Who was this mystery witness?
Where were they when the accident happened? Standing on the side of the road in the middle of the night, or were they in Paul’s car?
Was this person male or female?
We have a right to know because Dems are making this latest “attack” an “election talking point,” so what’s really going on here?
I'm glad you're here, WayneDupree.com comments! Please maintain polite and on-topic conversations. You could see comments from our Community Managers, who will be identified by a "WD Staff" or "Staff" label, in order to promote fruitful and civil discussions. We stop accepting comments on articles three days after they are posted in order to provide the optimal user experience. The conversations forums on WayneDupree.com welcome comments for an unlimited period of time. For further information, please refer to our community policies.
SIGN UP HERE and join us!
Follow Wayne on Rumble!