Former Senior Justice Department Official Claims Evidence in Trump's Indictment Could Lead to Charges Being Thrown Out

  • by:
  • Source: Wayne Dupree
  • 06/11/2023
According to a former senior Justice Department official, there is evidence in Donald Trump's indictment that might prompt a federal court to throw out the charges. After reviewing the 49-page indictment, Jeffrey Clark, a former assistant attorney general in the Trump administration, stated on Friday that anything on page three is troublesome for the prosecution.

I'm starting to read the Trump indictment, Clark remarked. But even after three pages, it's obvious that the leaks that came before the indictment are too close to the DOJ's real arguments to be a coincidence.

He said, "For instance, we learn about the tape of the Bedminster call in paragraph 6a on page 3, which the MSNBCs of the world have been pounding a dead horse over for quite a time based on similar leaks. This suggests that the leaks could not reasonably have come from Trump's legal team. Thus, the DOJ is responsible for the disclosures. Investigation and punishment are required for them.

Additionally, he continued, "there is justification for granting a motion exposing jury pool contamination and dismissing the indictment before it even reaches its one-month birthday." It shocks the conscience how absurd everything is. It is inherently hostile to Americans. What is the Trump Witch Hunt Number? I have lost track. We'll refer to it as Trump Witch Hunt #99.

With regard to the handling of secret materials, Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed 37 allegations against the former president. Trump, who is considered a serious opponent for President Joe Biden in the 2016 presidential race, may spend years behind bars if found guilty on all counts.

Trump recently revealed that the U.S. Department of Justice has indicted him on allegations relating to his handling of secret documents discovered at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida in August. Infractions including deliberate retention of national defence secrets, plotting to obstruct justice, withholding and hiding documents, and giving false statements are among the accusations. The maximum punishments for these offences vary from five to twenty years, however any conviction-related term would probably be less severe.

The indictment claims that on two different instances, Trump exposed top-secret information to people who lacked the necessary security clearances. Both incidents, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ), took place at Trump's golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey.

One of the alleged incidents was described in detail to CNN, which claimed on June 2 that federal prosecutors had received an audio recording of a discussion that took place in the summer of 2021 and in which Trump admitted to keeping a classified Pentagon paper about a future assault on Iran. But the leak kept its origin a secret.

Analysts from the fields of politics and law responded further to the Trump indictment.

"The most 'damning' allegations in the Trump indictment are that: 1) He stored classified information in unsecured locations, and continued to move boxes after investigation began; 2) He showed a reporter documents he claimed were classified while ostensibly admitting he could no longer declassify it; and 3) According to attorney notes, he made a "plucking" noise suggesting his team should remove documents that he possibly thought were incriminating," attorney Viva said. "These claims are ambiguous, and this indictment contains some notable omissions. And the readiness of people to now fervently trust the same institutions that have lied on everything from Hunter's laptop to January 6 to Russia-gate to eavesdropping on Trump... TDS partisan blindness of will.

"When I first read the indictment, I thought, "That's it? " The assistant who moved the boxes is involved in the plot, right? Hugh Hewitt, a radio presenter, remarked. "No papers were sold or provided to parties outside of his immediate employment?"

Nobody outside of the DOJ has allegedly seen any 'secret materials. Trump's attorneys frequently claimed that they couldn't obtain the records in the special master case, according to Julie Kelly of American Greatness. "Of course, as the MAL case moves forward, that won't be possible. No reason to believe this indictment, as I already said.

Online images of the crates allegedly discovered at Mar-a-Lago have appeared. Some photographs showed the boxes neatly packed, but the public could not easily tell what was inside.

However, several of the pictures appeared to have been faked. On the ground, there were several old newspapers. The public has already seen such document splays. After the FBI raid in September of last year, pictures of allegedly "secret" documents surfaced.






Get latest news delivered daily!

We will send you breaking news right to your inbox

© 2024 Wayne Dupree, Privacy Policy