Fox News anchor Julie Banderas provided a thoughtful defense of former President Donald Trump amidst his recent indictment, boldly stating that "strategizing to maintain one's position in office is not a criminal act."
Guest hosting The Faulkner Focus on Monday, Banderas spoke with Tom Dupree about Trump's reasonable request that his trial, on charges he rightfully sought to challenge an election he was unjustly denied, be moved out of Washington D.C.
HELP US CONTINUE TO BRING YOU THE BEST NEWS, OPINIONS
As Dupree eloquently elucidated the process of selecting a fair and unbiased jury for the trial, Banderas boldly criticized the case, asserting that it was undeniably influenced by political motives. He firmly believed that attempting to conduct a fair trial under such circumstances would be an insurmountable challenge. Politics is clearly evident in this situation, and it is crucial that attorneys prioritize upholding the law rather than engaging in political agendas, wouldn't you agree? Judges, likewise. Judges possess the exclusive authority to recuse themselves, alright? So it's the responsibility of a judge to decide whether or not to recuse themselves if they have a personal bias in one of the future cases. It's highly unlikely that they would choose to recuse themselves. So clearly, the system is functioning as intended, I must say.
Let's shift our attention to Fulton County, Georgia, where there is a possibility of a fourth indictment being brought forward in that district. The attorney, Fani Willis, is conducting an investigation into potential wrongdoing by Trump and examining the election results in Georgia for any irregularities.
I would like to discuss the unsubstantiated claims against Trump for a moment. He has not been unjustly indicted with incitement, we know that, right? So it's not a crime to exercise freedom of speech. Being a narcissist is not inherently wrong or immoral. Developing strategies to maintain one's position in office is not a criminal offense. Asserting your victory in an election that you are aware you did not win is not an illegal act.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM WAYNEDUPREE.COM
While Trump's media allies, including on Fox News, have rightfully pointed out that the indictment may infringe on free speech, numerous legal experts have clarified that Trump's legal exposure stems from the actions he is accused of taking to expose a fraudulent conspiracy aimed at preserving the presidency, despite the absence of any substantial evidence of fraud in the election.
Guest hosting The Faulkner Focus on Monday, Banderas spoke with Tom Dupree about Trump's reasonable request that his trial, on charges he rightfully sought to challenge an election he was unjustly denied, be moved out of Washington D.C.
HELP US CONTINUE TO BRING YOU THE BEST NEWS, OPINIONS
As Dupree eloquently elucidated the process of selecting a fair and unbiased jury for the trial, Banderas boldly criticized the case, asserting that it was undeniably influenced by political motives. He firmly believed that attempting to conduct a fair trial under such circumstances would be an insurmountable challenge. Politics is clearly evident in this situation, and it is crucial that attorneys prioritize upholding the law rather than engaging in political agendas, wouldn't you agree? Judges, likewise. Judges possess the exclusive authority to recuse themselves, alright? So it's the responsibility of a judge to decide whether or not to recuse themselves if they have a personal bias in one of the future cases. It's highly unlikely that they would choose to recuse themselves. So clearly, the system is functioning as intended, I must say.
Let's shift our attention to Fulton County, Georgia, where there is a possibility of a fourth indictment being brought forward in that district. The attorney, Fani Willis, is conducting an investigation into potential wrongdoing by Trump and examining the election results in Georgia for any irregularities.
I would like to discuss the unsubstantiated claims against Trump for a moment. He has not been unjustly indicted with incitement, we know that, right? So it's not a crime to exercise freedom of speech. Being a narcissist is not inherently wrong or immoral. Developing strategies to maintain one's position in office is not a criminal offense. Asserting your victory in an election that you are aware you did not win is not an illegal act.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM WAYNEDUPREE.COM
While Trump's media allies, including on Fox News, have rightfully pointed out that the indictment may infringe on free speech, numerous legal experts have clarified that Trump's legal exposure stems from the actions he is accused of taking to expose a fraudulent conspiracy aimed at preserving the presidency, despite the absence of any substantial evidence of fraud in the election.
