Federal Appeals Court: Unjust Sentencing of January 6 Defendant Sparks Potential Impact on Multiple Cases

On Friday, a federal appeals court determined that a defendant from January 6 was unjustly sentenced after pleading guilty to a non-violent misdemeanor. This ruling has the potential to affect numerous cases.

James Little, a resident of North Carolina, has been sentenced to prison and probation for his involvement in a misdemeanor parading offense. Little, who entered the Capitol Building on January 6 but did not participate in any violent activities, received a 60-day prison sentence and three years of probation.


According to the Associated Press, the D.C. appeals court ruled 2-1 on Friday that probation and imprisonment cannot be combined into a single sentence for a petty offense. The court stated that there are alternative options available for sentencing. Judge Robert Wilkins, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, cast the only dissenting vote.

The decision has the potential to nullify sentences given to numerous defendants involved in the events of January 6 and challenge the approach of U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves in his prosecutions. Graves continues to pursue individuals who attended the January 6 protest, even though it has been over two-and-a-half years since the event. This protest had escalated into a minor riot. It is worth noting that Graves chose not to investigate or prosecute far-left extremists who were responsible for setting fire to parts of Washington D.C. and attacking the White House in 2020.

Most of the January 6 defendants have been convicted or pleaded guilty to minor trespassing violations, such as picketing or parading, and have received relatively severe sentences.

Friday's decision may have an impact on approximately 80 defendants who have been given "split sentences," which refers to being sentenced to both prison time and probation for minor offenses. While some individuals impacted have already completed their prison sentences, the decision is expected to have an impact on forthcoming sentencing.

The judge who sentenced Little, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, emphasized the need for the Court to not only penalize Little for his actions but also to prevent him from repeating similar behavior in future elections. Imprisonment can be utilized to achieve the retributive objectives of sentencing. However, he emphasized that only a more extended period of probation would be sufficient to guarantee that Little does not engage in another riot.


The Department of Justice has the option to file an appeal. "We are currently evaluating the Court's decision and will make our future course of action in compliance with the applicable legal framework," stated a representative from the U.S. attorney's office, in response to the ruling.

Get latest news delivered daily!

We will send you breaking news right to your inbox

© 2023 Wayne Dupree, Privacy Policy