Supreme Court to Review Petition: Can Former President Trump be Prosecuted for Election Involvement?

The Supreme Court has recently decided to prioritize the review of a petition submitted by special counsel Jack Smith. This petition raises the question of whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted for his alleged involvement in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.

On Monday afternoon, the high court issued an order in response to Smith's petition. This occurred just hours after Smith had submitted the petition, requesting the court to consider the appeal. According to the court's directive, it has been mandated that Donald Trump is required to submit a response to the petition no later than 4 p.m. on December 20th.

On Monday, Smith submitted a petition to the high court, seeking their consideration on the matter of whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted for his actions after the 2020 election. Trump has contended that he is immune from such prosecution. Smith's decision to make this move is driven by his determination to ensure that the trial proceeds as planned, commencing on March 4, 2024.

In the filing, Smith raises an important question that lies at the core of our democratic system. The question pertains to whether a former President can be completely shielded from federal prosecution for any crimes committed during their time in office, or if they are constitutionally safeguarded from such prosecution if they have been impeached but not convicted prior to the initiation of criminal proceedings. The district court made the decision to dismiss the respondent's claims, acknowledging the fact that former Presidents are not exempt from the law and must face consequences for any violations of federal criminal law committed during their time in office.

The respondent's appeal of the ruling, which denied his immunity and related claims, has resulted in the suspension of the trial for the charges against him. The trial was originally scheduled to commence on March 4, 2024.

In his rationale for bringing President Trump's immunity claims directly to the Supreme Court, the special counsel referenced the 1974 landmark case United States v. Nixon. This decision by the high court has been invoked as a precedent, bypassing the federal appellate court in the process.

Similar action is justified in this case. In the case of Nixon, the author Smith argues that the urgency and significance of the issues at hand justify the intervention of the Court, even before the completion of appellate proceedings.

Prior to the court's announcement that it would hear Smith's petition, a spokesperson representing the former president strongly criticized the petition. According to the Trump spokesperson, Smith's actions were described as an attempt at a "Hail Mary," implying a desperate move. Additionally, the spokesperson emphasized that there is no valid justification for expediting the trial, suggesting that there is no urgency or necessity to do so.


According to the spokesperson, Deranged Jack Smith, who is associated with Crooked Joe Biden, is deeply fixated on meddling in the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election. Smith's primary objective is to hinder President Trump from reclaiming the Oval Office, a feat that the President appears to be on the verge of accomplishing. In pursuit of this goal, Smith is reportedly willing to take a desperate measure by swiftly approaching the Supreme Court and attempting to circumvent the usual Appellate Process. It is worth noting that the individual referred to as "Deranged" should be reminded of the Supreme Court's unfavorable rulings against him. One such instance was the McDonnell case, where the Court unanimously overturned his decision by a vote of 8-0, which is a rare occurrence.

According to the spokesperson, the prosecution in question is being characterized as politically motivated, a sentiment that President Trump has repeatedly expressed. The current situation involves an attack against Joe Biden's political opponent, which is being described as unprecedented and reminiscent of tactics seen in a Banana Republic. The current Witch Hunt being conducted against President Trump and his substantial base of supporters appears to lack a compelling justification for expediting the trial process. It seems that the primary objective of this investigation is to harm President Trump and the estimated 150 million individuals who align themselves with his political ideology. President Trump is committed to advocating for justice and opposing authoritarian tactics.

The Washington trial, which is currently scheduled for March 4, 2024, is set to take place during a significant period in the political landscape. Specifically, it falls right in the middle of the Republican presidential primary elections for that year. Notably, this trial date is just one day prior to Super Tuesday, a crucial day in the primary season where multiple states hold their elections simultaneously. In a filing submitted on Sunday, Smith put forth the argument that the district court should reject Trump's request to postpone the proceeding until a decision is reached on the matter of presidential immunity.


Get latest news delivered daily!

We will send you breaking news right to your inbox

© 2024 Wayne Dupree, Privacy Policy