In a significant legal move that underscores the tension between corporate policy and humanitarian needs, Marriott International has initiated a lawsuit against its franchisee, Pride Hotel. The legal action, filed on August 5th in the federal court of the Southern District of New York, accuses Pride Hotel of contract violation by transforming a hotel into a shelter for migrants without the consent of Marriott.
The company is seeking over $2.6 million in damages for what it terms an "alternative use" of the property located in Jamaica, New York.This dispute traces back to an extensive construction phase beginning in March 2015 when Pride acquired a plot for $5.3 million. Intended as an ambitious project under Marriott's Aloft and Element brands, the hotel was to feature 283 rooms spread across 18 stories and 110,000 square feet. Despite repeated extensions by Marriott to meet opening deadlines—the latest being November 1, 2023—Pride Hotel diverged from its original plan mere months before completion.
The situation came to light on August 14, 2023, when a Marriott manager noticed unusual activity at the site indicative of occupancy. Following this observation, communication from Pride's lawyers acknowledged economic challenges in operating as initially planned due to pressures from New York City to accommodate migrants.
Get the latest, most crucial news stories on the web – sent straight to your inbox for FREE as soon as they hit! Sign up for WayneDupree.com Email News Alerts in just 30 seconds!
Marriott alleges that despite using its branding, Pride failed to remit necessary franchise fees while engaging in a government contract to house migrants and asylum seekers. This breach led Marriott to terminate its franchise agreements with Pride in March earlier this year and subsequently demand compensation for damages incurred—a demand that remains unfulfilled according to the lawsuit.
The broader implications of this case reflect on New York City itself, grappling with an influx of migrants that has strained local resources and infrastructure. The city's reliance on hotels as makeshift shelters has precipitated not only legal confrontations like this but also significant societal impacts—an increase in accommodation costs and heightened safety concerns highlighted by an incident involving an illegal immigrant housed at another hotel who allegedly shot two NYPD officers during a traffic stop.
As both parties prepare their cases for court proceedings, this lawsuit stands at the intersection of business operations and social responsibility—a complex clash between contractual obligations and urgent humanitarian needs amidst ongoing migrant crises.
The company is seeking over $2.6 million in damages for what it terms an "alternative use" of the property located in Jamaica, New York.This dispute traces back to an extensive construction phase beginning in March 2015 when Pride acquired a plot for $5.3 million. Intended as an ambitious project under Marriott's Aloft and Element brands, the hotel was to feature 283 rooms spread across 18 stories and 110,000 square feet. Despite repeated extensions by Marriott to meet opening deadlines—the latest being November 1, 2023—Pride Hotel diverged from its original plan mere months before completion.
The situation came to light on August 14, 2023, when a Marriott manager noticed unusual activity at the site indicative of occupancy. Following this observation, communication from Pride's lawyers acknowledged economic challenges in operating as initially planned due to pressures from New York City to accommodate migrants.
Get the latest, most crucial news stories on the web – sent straight to your inbox for FREE as soon as they hit! Sign up for WayneDupree.com Email News Alerts in just 30 seconds!
Marriott alleges that despite using its branding, Pride failed to remit necessary franchise fees while engaging in a government contract to house migrants and asylum seekers. This breach led Marriott to terminate its franchise agreements with Pride in March earlier this year and subsequently demand compensation for damages incurred—a demand that remains unfulfilled according to the lawsuit.
The broader implications of this case reflect on New York City itself, grappling with an influx of migrants that has strained local resources and infrastructure. The city's reliance on hotels as makeshift shelters has precipitated not only legal confrontations like this but also significant societal impacts—an increase in accommodation costs and heightened safety concerns highlighted by an incident involving an illegal immigrant housed at another hotel who allegedly shot two NYPD officers during a traffic stop.
As both parties prepare their cases for court proceedings, this lawsuit stands at the intersection of business operations and social responsibility—a complex clash between contractual obligations and urgent humanitarian needs amidst ongoing migrant crises.
