FBI Under Fire: Inside the Leadership Failures and Controversies After New Year's Day Attack

  • by:
  • Source: Wayne Dupree
  • 01/05/2025
In a critical assessment of the FBI's handling of the New Year's Day terrorist attack in New Orleans, sources within the bureau have voiced their concerns over what they describe as a series of missteps and failures in leadership. The incident, which resulted in 14 fatalities and numerous injuries after Shamsud-Din Bahar Jabbar drove a pickup truck adorned with an ISIS flag into a crowd celebrating New Year's Eve, has been cited as evidence of the urgent need for new leadership at the FBI.

The initial response by FBI officials, particularly the refusal to immediately classify the event as a terrorist attack, has drawn sharp criticism from within. Agents highlight that such hesitancy contradicts basic investigative protocols and undermines public trust. The absence of Lyonel Myrthil, the Special Agent in Charge (SAC) for the New Orleans office, during this critical period further exacerbated concerns regarding leadership preparedness and responsiveness to significant threats.

This debacle highlights broader issues within the FBI’s current administration under Director Christopher A. Wray and Deputy Director Paul Abbate, both of whom are set to depart from their positions before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20. Their proposed successor, Kash Patel, is seen by some agents as a necessary change to restore efficiency and credibility to the bureau.

The controversy extends to public communications mishandled by Assistant Special Agent in Charge Alethea Duncan, whose casual appearance and contradictory statements at a press conference following the attack sparked debate about professionalism and consistency in the bureau's public engagements.

Critiques from within also touch on perceived biases in investigative priorities, suggesting an overemphasis on prosecuting right-wing affiliations while neglecting other forms of domestic terrorism. This critique points toward a deeper issue of ideological influence affecting operational objectivity within federal law enforcement agencies.

Furthermore, procedural lapses were highlighted by agents' reports of inadequate security measures post-investigation at Jabbar’s residence—an oversight that allowed unauthorized access to potential evidence. Such lapses not only compromise investigations but also raise questions about adherence to legal standards and protections against third-party interference.

As these events unfold, it becomes increasingly clear that significant reforms are necessary within the FBI to address both operational failures and issues of public perception. The urgency for competent leadership is apparent—not only to guide effective responses to threats but also to ensure rigorous adherence to procedure and impartiality in law enforcement practices across all levels.

In light of these concerns, it is imperative for those within and outside law enforcement communities to advocate for accountability, transparency, and reform within federal agencies tasked with national security. Engaging elected representatives to prioritize these issues ensures that future incidents are handled with the utmost competence and integrity—reaffirming public trust in those dedicated to protecting our nation.

Get latest news delivered daily!

We will send you breaking news right to your inbox

© 2025 Wayne Dupree, Privacy Policy