Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has revoked the security detail of retired General Mark Milley, who previously served as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under both Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The decision comes despite ongoing threats to Milley’s safety. Additionally, Hegseth has instructed the acting inspector general of the Department of Defense to open an investigation into Milley for allegedly “undermining the chain of command” during Trump’s first term. The move was first reported by Fox News Chief National Security Correspondent Jennifer Griffin on Tuesday.
Hegseth’s actions, described as highly unusual, have raised questions across political and defense circles. In addition to the security detail revocation, he has ordered the removal of a second portrait of Milley from Army halls. Griffin reported on Fox News’ Special Report: “Secretary Hegseth has decided, on just his second day, to pull General Milley’s security detail, even though multiple threats on his life remain. The administration has stated that former officials cannot have security protection indefinitely.”
Milley became a polarizing figure after reports surfaced that he had communicated with Chinese officials following the 2020 election, attempting to reassure them that the United States would not launch an attack. These communications came amid Trump’s efforts to contest his election loss. Trump and his allies have accused Milley of overstepping his authority, with Trump even suggesting Milley be executed for “treason.” Former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, however, has defended Milley’s actions as necessary to ensure global stability during a volatile time.
Hegseth’s directive also includes a review board to evaluate if Milley should be stripped of a star in retirement, a punitive measure rarely taken against high-ranking military officials. By ordering this investigation, Hegseth appears to align with Trump’s criticism of Milley’s actions during his presidency. Critics argue this could set a dangerous precedent for politicizing military leadership, while others contend it is a justified response to alleged breaches of protocol.
Hegseth’s decisions have sparked debates over the treatment of retired military officials and the balance between accountability and political retribution. The removal of Milley’s security detail, in particular, raises concerns about protecting former officials who face credible threats. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, when asked about the issue, stated: “The president believes there must be limits to how long former officials receive security protection.”
As this story continues to unfold, the implications for military ethics, accountability, and civilian-military relations remain significant. We want to hear from you. What do you think about Hegseth’s actions and their potential consequences for military leadership? Share your comments below.
