Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) team are facing legal battles and mounting criticism as they push forward efforts to scale back federal agencies, eliminate diversity initiatives, and align governmental operations with President Donald Trump’s agenda. The group’s actions, which include accessing sensitive data and shutting down entire agencies, have sparked protests, lawsuits, and investigations.
Since Trump’s inauguration, DOGE has moved rapidly to implement sweeping changes across government agencies. With limited transparency, Musk’s team has dismantled diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, shut down major federal functions, and trimmed agency operations. Critics claim these actions violate civil service protections, union agreements, and federal law, while the administration insists DOGE operates within legal bounds.
On January 8, the administration sent buyout offers to over two million federal workers, including employees from high-security agencies like the CIA. However, on February 5, U.S. District Judge George O’Toole Jr. temporarily blocked the offers after federal unions filed lawsuits. The court extended the deadline to February 10, preventing immediate layoffs.
DOGE members have gained access to critical government systems, raising alarms among lawmakers and civil rights groups. For instance, a DOGE official entered the Department of Commerce, which oversees NOAA (the federal agency responsible for weather forecasting and climate data). According to Senator Chris Van Hollen, the employee searched NOAA systems for staff information and DEI data.
Similarly, the Treasury Department granted DOGE access to the federal payment system that manages trillions of dollars in government expenditures. However, after unions challenged this move in court, a judge limited DOGE’s access to read-only data.
Musk announced plans on February 2 to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which oversees global humanitarian efforts. However, USAID’s website was taken offline before the announcement, leaving aid workers and partner organizations in uncertainty. On February 6, a lawsuit was filed to prevent the closure. The following day, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order to halt the agency’s shutdown and stop DOGE from placing 2,200 employees on administrative leave.
DOGE itself has faced internal challenges, including the resignation of member Marko Elez on February 6. Reports linked Elez to social media accounts allegedly involved in racist comments. Musk later polled his X followers about reinstating Elez but provided no further updates.
Democrats have strongly opposed DOGE’s actions. Congressional members staged protests outside affected agencies and attempted to enter facilities, but DOGE officials and Trump’s administration barred them. Senate Democrats also launched investigations into DOGE’s access to federal student loan data, which raised privacy concerns.
Meanwhile, courts have stepped in to block some of DOGE’s initiatives. Judges have issued orders halting layoffs, limiting access to sensitive systems, and delaying controversial policies.
Despite the criticism, Trump has repeatedly praised Musk’s efforts, describing them as a crackdown on waste and corruption. Musk, however, faces accusations of undermining federal safeguards and compromising the integrity of civil service protections. Vice President J.D. Vance also joined Musk in attacking media outlets, including reporters critical of DOGE’s actions.
The future of DOGE’s initiatives remains uncertain as legal challenges mount and public scrutiny intensifies. While some moves have been temporarily halted by court orders, others continue to raise ethical and operational questions about the federal overhaul process.
What are your thoughts on Musk’s approach to federal reform and the legal battles surrounding DOGE? Share your comments below.
